Sunday, August 27. 2006
include_once ("../JavaScripts/google_iris-blog_top.inc"); ?>
Egyptian religious leaders, some government-appointed, were arguing over the validity of a religious edict, broadcast on satellite television, that calls for believers to kill "any Zionist anywhere in wartime."
The cleric who issued the edict later modified it to apply only to Israeli Jews, and was quoted in an Egyptian newspaper saying: "I myself am ready to slash the throat of any Israeli I meet."
Egypt?s government-appointed grand mufti took issue with this ruling?not because calling for the murder of Jews and Israelis is wrong, but for a more technical reason. Israelis traveling in Egypt have visas, and, according to the mufti, a visa is a "safe-conduct pass." Thus, Jews holding Egyptian visas should not be killed.
On the other hand, the same grand mufti had some days earlier pointed to an anti-Semitic book about Jews using human blood to make matzah, offering this as evidence that Hezbollah was fighting against "blood-thirsty murderers" and "blood-suckers."
The incitement to kill Jews, the debate over whether the killing is allowed everywhere or only outside of Egypt, and the citing of the blood libel canard by a government-appointed cleric certainly helps explain why some Muslims hate Israel and Jews so much that they are willing to resort to terrorism. It also shows that anti-Israel hatred is in many instances inseparable from classic anti-Semitism.
It seems that not one news outlet other than AFP bothered to report on this incitement.
Click here to subscribe to our email list and receive a daily summary of our top blog stories.