Sunday, August 27. 2006
include_once ("../JavaScripts/google_iris-blog_top.inc"); ?>
By Sam Ser (Jerusalem Post)
M can't understand it. How could Israel let Hezbollah grow so bold, encroaching on the northern border, after the IDF's withdrawal in May of 2000?
"For six years, everyone fell asleep," he says. "But we knew what was coming."
"We" are former soldiers of the South Lebanon Army, Israel's main ally for close to 20 years in the area now effectively ruled by Hezbollah. A few thousand of the crumbling army's remaining fighters and their relatives retreated with the IDF into Israel six years ago. Most live close to the Lebanese border and many - like M, a former demolitions officer who operated throughout the length and breadth of southern Lebanon and knows Hezbollah well - expected to be asked for help in preparing Israel's battle plans in the past month of fighting.
None received so much as a phone call.
When elite infantry units suffered serious losses in raids on Maroun a-Ras and Bint Jbail, and the air force failed to locate and destroy Katyusha rockets that pounded the North day after day, some suggested that the IDF was woefully short on valuable intelligence regarding the area - an area, it should be noted, where the former SLA men grew up, and where they patrolled for years.
"Absolutely, we could have helped," S insists. "We know where every stone is. We called to offer our help, but... nothing."
THE EX-SLA men didn't expect to be asked to fight. They were never officially part of the IDF and have had no connection to the Defense Ministry. Their only government contact in the past six years has come from the Housing and Construction Ministry, to arrange their living conditions.
But the men have an open account with Hizbullah that only Israel can settle. And at least some were eager to advise Israel's generals against the mistakes their own comrades made against the Shi'ite militia.
"Had they called me in," says M, "I would have told them, don't send in soldiers right away, it's a trap."
What would he have suggested, had he been able to help prepare a battle plan?
"I would definitely not have entered villages straight away, like the IDF did. They should have encircled those villages where all the Hezbollah fighters were, to prevent them from escaping, and then bomb them from the air.
"Also," M continues, "I would have told them not to bomb civilian centers like Beirut and Tyre, but to focus their bombing raids on Hezbollah hubs like Bint Jbail and Maroun a-Ras.
"All Israel succeeded in doing," he says sadly, "was to turn the Lebanese people into Hezbollah supporters."
"Watching the war from home on the television was a total disappointment," adds D, who served in the SLA's equivalent of the Shin Bet security service. "It hurt a lot to see all those Israeli soldiers getting killed... the IDF's plan was not so smart. It made me think that the IDF doesn't realize what Hezbollah is like."
While S watched news of the fighting he, too, couldn't figure out why the IDF didn't carry out more air strikes on the southern villages where the Hezbollah fighters were entrenched, before sending in soldiers.
"I know that Israeli soldiers are better than Hezbollah fighters," he says, "so when I saw what was happening in Bint Jbail [where Israel lost several soldiers during the month-long conflict] I said to myself, why are they suffering so many losses? Have they forgetten Hezbollah's style of fighting?"
IT WOULD be fair to ask how much SLA fighters have forgotten, considering that they, too, have been absent from Hezbollah's stomping grounds as long as Israeli soldiers have. Likewise, the well-trained, well-equipped forces that Israel encountered in Kantara and Marjayoun last month were not the same guerrillas that, despite their shortcomings, still managed to chase the SLA from its outposts years ago.
"It's true," says M, "that things have changed. When we were there, Hezbollah was not so well armed; mostly, they had older weapons. And, they used less efficient tactics. Now, I know, they're much better."
But the real problem, he says, is that "it's hard for Israel to fight them effectively as a democratic state, with principles and a large army. You can't fight guerrillas unless you act like guerrillas, too."
It's precisely that point, though, that makes the SLA's experience so salient.
And, it isn't entirely true that the veterans now in Israel are removed from what's happening in Lebanon.
M sees much of what happens in his homeland through the eyes of his family members, almost all of whom are still there. He can't speak directly to them over the phone, because it's too dangerous.
"They listen to the conversations," he explains. "But I can speak with my mother in the United States. We speak in code about what's happening with our family in Lebanon."
"I know that Israeli soldiers are better than Hezbollah fighters," he says, "so when I saw what was happening in Bint Jbail [where Israel lost several soldiers during the month-long conflict] I said to myself, why are they suffering so many losses? Have they forgetten Hezbollah's style of fighting?"
IT WOULD be fair to ask how much SLA fighters have forgotten, considering that they, too, have been absent from Hezbollah's stomping grounds as long as Israeli soldiers have. Likewise, the well-trained, well-equipped forces that Israel encountered in Kantara and Marjayoun last month were not the same guerrillas that, despite their shortcomings, still managed to chase the SLA from its outposts years ago.
"It's true," says M, "that things have changed. When we were there, Hezbollah was not so well armed; mostly, they had older weapons. And, they used less efficient tactics. Now, I know, they're much better."
But the real problem, he says, is that "it's hard for Israel to fight them effectively as a democratic state, with principles and a large army. You can't fight guerrillas unless you act like guerrillas, too."
It's precisely that point, though, that makes the SLA's experience so salient.
And, it isn't entirely true that the veterans now in Israel are removed from what's happening in Lebanon.
M sees much of what happens in his homeland through the eyes of his family members, almost all of whom are still there. He can't speak directly to them over the phone, because it's too dangerous.
"They listen to the conversations," he explains. "But I can speak with my mother in the United States. We speak in code about what's happening with our family in Lebanon."
On both sides of the border, M says, there is a feeling that Hezbollah has been anything but crippled.
"This is no victory for the IDF," he says. "And what's more, this is only the beginning. I'm telling you, one day Hezbollah will reach Kiryat Shmona."
"This was only the first stage," agrees S, who can't understand why Israel accepted the cease-fire without inflicting greater damage on Hizbullah.
"Israel needs to continue the fighting, because this is not the end. It must cut off the head of the snake, not merely its tail," says D.
"You know," he continues with a sigh, "we really could have helped."
For the IDF to ignore the possible advantages of consulting the ex-fighters, says Dr. Mordechai Kedar, "is pure arrogance."
"Israelis tend to think that they can do everything through the strength of their weapons; they think they don't need anyone who speaks Arabic, or who undersands the Arab mentality, in order to fight Arabs," says Kedar, a member of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University who has 25 years of experience in the IDF's Military Intelligence. "They wouldn't even consider talking to former SLA men."
Still, D concludes hopefully, perhaps the fighting will continue, and the former SLA men will soon get their chance to contribute.
"If people are willing to help," asks S, "why not use them?"
The Jerusalem Post asked the IDF Spokesman's Office the same question. There was no answer.
Click here to subscribe to our email list and receive a daily summary of our top blog stories.
|